sample objections to request for production of documents california

/TT1 12 Tf T* C)-3.7 (o)9.9 (de)4 ( \247 1013\()3.8 (a)4 (\))2.1 ( )-9.8 (\()3.7 (w)2 (he)3.1 (n )]TJ Q Mons)-1.4 (a)3.1 (nt)-2 (o a)4 (l)-2 (so)-2 ( )]TJ [(i)-1.1 (s )-62.9 (l)-2 (i)-2 (st)-3.1 (e)3 (d )-49 (a)3.9 (s )-222.6 (N)1.9 (o. [(ON)-2.701 (S)-10.301 (A)10.1 (NT)-16.104 (O)-1.898 ( )-3.002 (C)5.201 (O)-1.797 (. Start early. /TT0 9.96 Tf ET q 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 139.0848 75.2636 Tm /Annots [] Common objections to requests for production or inspection include: The request is overly broad or unduly burdensome. (15)Tj [( t)-2 (ha)4 (t)-1.9 ( t)-2 (he)3.7 ( c)3.2 (i)-1.9 (t)-1.2 (e)3.1 (d doc)4 (um)-1.9 (e)4.8 (nt)-2.8 ( i)-2 (s )-2 (a)3.8 ( f)3 (or)2.1 (mal a)-6 (ge)3.9 (nc)-15.9 (y)19 ( de)-5 (t)-2 (e)3 (r)3 (m)-1.9 (i)-1.1 (na)3 (t)-1.9 (i)-1.1 (on of)2 ( EPA. [(A)2 (dm)-2 (i)-1.1 (t)-2 ( t)-2 (ha)3.9 (t)-1.9 ( t)-2 (he)3.9 ( 1983 pa)3.1 (t)-1.8 (hol)-1.2 (og)-10.9 (y)20.8 ( )19.2 (r)3 (e)4.8 (po)-9.9 (r)2.1 (t)-1.1 ( c)3.1 (onduc)14 (t)-2 (e)4 (d b)10 (y)20.8 ( B)6.2 (i)-1.1 (o/)-2 (d)-10.8 (y)29.9 (na)4.8 (m)-2.7 (i)-2 (c)4.7 (s)-1.7 ( f)3.7 (or)3 ( )10 (S)-4.8 (t)-1.9 (ud)10.7 (y)19.2 ( )-9.1 (B)6.1 (D)2 (N)2 (-)]TJ 2017-10-16T17:22:13-07:00 Typically, if you requested a document, but the other side claims it doesn't exist, you can object to the judge if they try to introduce the document at trial. /ExtGState 151 0 R Serving Written Objections A third party that has received a subpoena for production of documents may respond with written objections, which must state the legal basis for objecting to each request. describe a time when you were treated unfairly. 36 0 Td /TT1 12 Tf (9)Tj 2.59 -24 Td endobj Continue Reading Arent I Entitled to a Privilege Log? 65 0 obj T* 48 0 Td /Rotate 0 T* [(R)2 (E)-2.1 (S)-4 (P)10 (O)-1.9 (N)1.9 (S)-3.9 (E)-2.1 (:)]TJ /Type /Page (28)Tj 26 April 2023 . 39 0 obj /CropBox [0 0 612 792] endobj C.C.P. /Annots [] T* stream /ExtGState 139 0 R See Bihun v. AT&T Info. /Differences [24 /breve /caron /circumflex /dotaccent /hungarumlaut /ogonek /ring /tilde 39 T* 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 4.691315 36 cm (26)Tj /Artifact <>BDC Q 0 -24 TD (1)Tj Indeed, the Court has ordered the parties to disclose the likelihood that they will call those persons as witnesses, and Plaintiff has done so, reducing the list of 184 individuals and entities to 31 individuals whose testimony Plaintiff is very likely or likely to present at trial, either by live testimony or deposition. In the course of its civil investigation of Dentsply's distribution and marketing of artificial teeth, Plaintiff interviewed a number of individuals, but interviewed none pursuant to Civil Investigative Demand Number 13009, a document request issued to Dentsply. /Type /Page [( t)-2 (ha)3.9 (t)-1.9 ( t)-2 (he)3.9 ( c)4.9 (i)-1.9 (t)-2.9 (e)4.8 (d m)-1.9 (e)3.9 (m)-1.9 (or)2.9 (a)3.1 (nd)-9 (um)-2.9 ( da)4.8 (t)-1.9 (e)3.9 (d 9/)-1.9 (4/)-2 (84 f)2.9 (r)2.2 (om)-1.1 ( )]TJ /Icircumflex /Idieresis /Eth /Ntilde /Ograve /Oacute /Ocircumflex /Otilde /Odieresis /multiply [(f)3 (or)3 ( i)-1.9 (n t)-2.1 (hi)-2 (s t)-2.3 (i)-2 (t)-2.8 (l)-2 (e)4.7 (\224)4 ( w)1.1 (hich inc)3 (l)-1.9 (ude)4.8 (s)-1.8 ( r)3.8 (e)3.2 (qu)-10 (e)4.8 (st)-4.6 (s )-2 (f)2.7 (or)3 ( a)3.1 (dmi)-4 (s)-11.8 (si)-2.4 (on\))2.1 (;)-1.1 ( C)-3 (a)3.9 (l)-1.9 (. T* SET NUMBER: ONE (1) To Plaintiff, Acme, Inc . m)-2 (a)3.9 (l)-1.9 (e)3 ( mi)-4 (c)3 (e)4.1 ( 4029, 4032 )]TJ -6 -24 Td 2 0 obj Thus, these materials were created and maintained in a manner consistent with maintaining the protections afforded work product. [(N)2 (o. Q . /CropBox [0 0 612 792] (5. >> /Fm1 Do 3: Provide a summary of the expected testimony of each witness identified in response to Interrogatory No. /TT0 11.03 Tf (9)Tj /Metadata 7 0 R The statutes all contain the same language, but its not that easy to decipher. /Type /Page They produced redacted documents, no privilege log yet. [(D)1.1 (E)-2 (N)1.8 (IE)-4.8 (S)-4.8 ( )]TJ Providing such information in answering this interrogatory would be oppressive, unduly burdensome and unnecessarily expensive, and the burden of providing such information in answering this interrogatory is substantially the same or less for Defendant as for Plaintiff. endstream Here are some examples of technology you can include in your objective: Network capabilities. -334.67 -24 Td All such information, prepared in anticipation of litigation and not disclosed or otherwise maintained in a way that is inconsistent with the purpose of the privilege, is protected by the work product doctrine. [(1)-1.296 ( )]TJ (3)Tj [1] ( )Tj 123.83 538.67 436.19 -1.19 re PLAINTIFF requests that the following Documents and things be identified, produced and made available for inspection and copying at the law firm of Selarz Law Corp., located at 11777 San Vicente Blvd., Suite 702, Los Angeles, California 90049. [(dupl)-1.1 (i)-2 (c)3.1 (a)4 (t)-2 (i)-2 (ve)4 ( of)3.8 ( di)-2.8 (sc)2.8 (ove)4 (r)-16.9 (y)19.1 ( )-9.9 (a)4.7 (l)-1.9 (r)2.9 (e)3.2 (a)4.8 (d)-20.7 (y)20.7 ( p)-9.9 (e)3.1 (r)3 (m)-1.9 (i)-2 (t)-1.2 (t)-2 (e)3.1 (d. )]TJ /OCProperties 2 0 R 44.75 0 Td endstream [(D)2 (E)-2.1 (NI)1.1 (E)-2 (S)]TJ /Resources 119 0 R T* /Type /Page T* Below is a sample request for production of documents in a motor vehicle crash case that later settled for $750,000. /TT1 12 Tf 574.8 791.16 0.71 -791.16 re r8mM4=b.s2@ytgY (27)Tj ( )Tj q T* (1)Tj endobj 0 -24 TD q A discovery request can ask what evidence the person knows, but cannot ask what a person thinks the evidence means. endobj (17)Tj /TT0 12 Tf -72 -24 Td 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 4.691315 36 cm /TT0 12 Tf Continue Reading Are You Following Up on Your Opponents Discovery Responses? (11)Tj >> /Contents [60 0 R 61 0 R 62 0 R] 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 4.691315 36 cm ET These responses and objections are made without prejudice to, and are not a waiver of, Plaintiff's right to rely on other facts or documents at trial. /Annots [] (16)Tj 58.19 726.6 32.4 -673.2 re (26)Tj q T* In the previous blog, Start Preparing Your Motion Because with These Responses Youre Going to Court, I used the following example as a type of response I see as a Discovery Referee: Responding party hereby incorporates its general objections as if fully stated herein. -73.07 -24 Td Sys (1993) 13 CA4th 976, 991 (pdf) (reversed on other grounds) and CEB 8:10. See Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 33(d). T* /TT0 12 Tf (21)Tj [( t)-1.9 (ha)3 (t,)-2 ( af)4 (t)-1.9 (e)4.7 (r)3.1 ( r)-7.8 (e)4.8 (a)3.9 (so)-1.6 (n)-11.7 (a)3.9 (bl)-1.9 (e)4.8 ( )]TJ endobj /Length 131 0 R /CropBox [0 0 612 792] (4)Tj [(Mons)-1.4 (a)3.1 (nt)-2 (o ot)-1.1 (he)3.1 (r)2.9 (w)2.9 (i)-2.8 (se)2.8 ( )]TJ (7)Tj q See my blog " Make Sure you are aware of the New Document Response Requirements" for an updated analysis. 30 0 obj ( )Tj T* However, there is another issue that you should take very seriouslythe document response is not in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure section 2031.230., Continue Reading Nail Down Whether the Documents You are Seeking ever Existed and Where They are Now. /Filter /FlateDecode Boilerplate objections are becoming more and more common in response to each of the document requests. q (5)Tj 19 0 obj f 96.837 -24 Td (17)Tj Even so construed, the request is duplicative, overbroad, and burdensome to the extent that it calls for documents already produced to Defendant in response to Defendant's February 2, 1999 Request for Documents, including, but not limited to, documents produced to Plaintiff by third parties, transcripts of the depositions of third parties, and correspondence from third parties to Plaintiff. T* 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 82.9293 679.0819 Tm Q Are You Following Up on Your Opponents Discovery Responses? 25 0 obj Defendant's document requests and interrogatory call for the production of documents and information that were produced to the Plaintiff by other entities and that may contain confidential, proprietary, or trade secret information. In its responses, the defendant asserted boilerplate objections. >> /TT1 12 Tf Q >> )]TJ Standard objections to discovery requests under the FRCP and the Cal. 106.55 66.35 470.88 -0.48 re [(doc)4 (um)-2 (e)4 (nt)-2 ( da)4.8 (t)-2.7 (e)4.7 (d Ma)-8.6 (r)3.7 (c)4 (h 1)-10.7 (3, 1985, s)-1.4 (t)-2.2 (a)3.1 (t)-1.9 (e)3.9 (s,)-1.8 ( \223)2.9 (Mo)-1.8 (ns)-3.7 (a)4.8 (nt)-11.9 (o i)-2 (s )-2 (c)2 (onc)4 (e)4.9 (r)3 (n)-10.8 (e)4 (d t)-2 (ha)4.8 (t)-2.8 ( e)4.8 (ve)3.1 (n t)-11.9 (he)4.8 ( i)-2.8 (ni)-2 (t)-2 (i)-1.1 (a)3.1 (t)-2 (i)-1.1 (on of)2.1 ( )]TJ [(D)2 (E)-2.1 (NI)1.1 (E)-2 (S)-4.9 ( )]TJ /Font 153 0 R /CropBox [0 0 612 792] [(W)-5.1 (i)-2.9 (l)-2 (l)-1.9 (i)-1.2 (a)3.1 (m)-2 ( D)-7.1 (y)29.9 (kst)-4.6 (r)3.7 (a)3.2 (, P)-3.1 (h.D)1.9 (., )-10.8 (To)1.8 (x)-8.1 (i)-2.9 (c)4.8 (ol)-1.9 (ogy)19.9 ( )-10.7 (B)7.7 (r)3 (a)3.1 (n)-9 (c)3.9 (h, EP)-1.9 (A)-8.9 ( H)2 (a)4.8 (z)-6.8 (a)4 (r)3.8 (d Ev)2 (a)4.1 (lu)-2 (a)2 (t)-1.9 (i)-1.1 (on Divis)-12.9 (i)-1.1 (on, )]TJ endobj California Code of Civil Procedure 2025.220(a) sets out what you need to identify in the notice, including who will be deposed, where the deposition will be taken, and the intention to video or audio record the testimony. stream ( )Tj (24)Tj f 3 to refer to "Civil Investigative Demand No. /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] GENERAL OBJECTIONS 1. (22)Tj T* Q /Contents [116 0 R 117 0 R 118 0 R] q -73.07 -24 Td (2)Tj T* [(2)-1.296 ( )]TJ (13)Tj X/g. (23)Tj 44.89 0 Td /ITXT (2.1.7) T* >> -315 -48 Td /TT1 12 Tf [(de)4 (a)4.8 (dl)-2.7 (i)-2 (ne)4.6 (s )-1.8 (pr)1.1 (ovi)-1.9 (de)3.9 (d b)-19.9 (y)19.9 ( t)-1.9 (h)-10.9 (e)4 ( C)-2.9 (a)3.9 (l)-1.9 (i)-2 (f)2.9 (or)3.8 (ni)-2.7 (a)4.7 ( C)-2.9 (ode)3.9 ( of)2.1 ( C)-2 (i)-2 (vi)-12 (l)-2 ( P)-4.8 (r)3.7 (oc)4 (e)3.2 (dur)3 (e)4.8 (. Comply with Rule 34s requirement that you state whether any responsive materials are being withheld on the basis of the objection. 2019-01-28T14:14:04-08:00 /Resources 55 0 R /XObject 152 0 R Should any such disclosure by Plaintiff occur, it is inadvertent and shall not constitute a waiver of any privilege. (13)Tj 44.77 0 Td 44.76 0 Td In Fischer v. Forrest, 14 Civ. /TT1 12 Tf Q stream >> >> Responding party objects that plaintiff has equal access to these documents. [(f)3 (or)3 (m)-1.9 (ul)-2.1 (a)4 (t)-2 (i)-2 (ons )-2 (t)-2.1 (ha)3 (t)-1.9 ( w)1.9 (e)4.9 (r)3 (e)3.2 ( )-10 (a)-6 (va)3.9 (i)-1.9 (l)-2 (a)3.9 (bl)-1.9 (e)3.9 ( f)3.9 (or)3 ( sa)1.2 (l)-11.9 (e)4.8 ( i)-2.8 (n t)-2 (he)4.8 ( U)-8.8 (ni)-1.1 (t)-2 (e)3 (d S)-3 (t)-2 (a)3.9 (t)-1.9 (e)3 (s )-1.8 (a)3 (s )-1.8 (of)1.1 ( J)-10 (une)3 ( 29, 2017, but )]TJ BT 332.51 0 Td 1304/1307 (S.D.N.Y., Feb. 18, 2017), the plaintiff requested the production of almost a decade of emails, letters, and marketing materials. -310.67 -24 Td q [(D)2 (i)-2 (vi)-1.1 (si)-4 (on c)3.9 (onc)3.1 (l)-1.9 (ude)3.9 (d t)-1.9 (ha)4.8 (t)-2.8 ( t)-2 (he)4.8 ( r)3 (e)3.2 (na)3.9 (l)-1.9 ( t)-2 (ubul)-1.1 (e)3 ( )-9 (a)3.9 (de)3.2 (nom)-2 (a)4 (s)-10.1 ( f)2.9 (ound i)-1.9 (n t)-2.9 (he)4.8 ( m)-1.9 (i)-2.9 (d-)3.8 ( a)3.1 (nd hig)7.9 (h-)3 (dos)-11.8 (e)4 ( )-9.1 (g)9.1 (r)3.8 (oup )]TJ /TT1 12 Tf T* [(M)-1.8 (onsa)2.8 (nt)-12 (o )]TJ If the request is not reasonably related to any claim or defense, and if there is no good reason to go beyond the ordinary scope of discovery under Rule 26(b), take the time to explain why in your discovery response. Respondent objects to the Request to the extent that it seeks information that may be protected by the attorney-client privilege, the work-product doctrine, the joint defense privilege or any other privilege. 37.07 0 Td 65.4 648.61 Td 104.03 792 0.83 -792 re Objection made to requests for production of document that do not exist or not in the attorney or party's possession violate an attorney's ethical duty under Bus & PC 6068 (d) to act truthfully and, therefore, constitutes bad faith. endobj [( t)-2.8 (ha)4.7 (t)-1.8 ( t)-2.9 (he)4.7 ( c)3.2 (it)-4.1 (e)3.1 (d )]TJ (6)Tj (12)Tj /TT1 12 Tf T* /Artifact <>BDC Such materials contain the mental impressions, conclusions, opinions, and legal theories of the Government's attorneys in summarizing the Government's understanding of information obtained in the interview, for instance by the emphasis in memoranda of the specific issues of interest to the Division's legal analysis. q 0 -24 TD >> (5)Tj T* [(M)-1.496 (ON)-2.701 (S)-10.301 (A)10.1 (NT)-16.104 (O)-1.898 ( )-3.002 (C)5.201 (O)-1.797 (. If you need to request documents in an employment discrimination case or if you need to respond to a request for documents from the other side, you can get templates from the Legal Help Centers. T* 6. Wheres the Authority to Award Sanctions? 12 0 obj -6 -24 Td 3. /Length 124 0 R q 2031.050, that allow the propounding party to ask for updated information bearing on answers already made and later acquired or discovered documents, tangible things, land or other property.. 5. 49.55 0 Td 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 83.0246 679.0819 Tm 192.96 0 Td 1.0999999 0 0 1.0999999 -6.7270933 -39.599996 cm \()2.2 (MON)-5.3 (G)-8.9 (LY)4 (04276047\))3 ( [)-7 (Th)2 (is)-1.2 ( R)-3 (e)3.9 (que)3.1 (st)-3.8 ( i)-1.1 (s )-2 (l)-3 (i)-2.9 (st)-4 (e)4.8 (d a)4 (s )]TJ -332.51 -24 Td -39.96 -12 Td 7. 7 0 obj Rule 33 (Interrogatories to Parties) also requires specificity when making objections. /Type /Catalog [(ON)-2.701 (S)-10.301 (A)10.1 (NT)-16.104 (O)-1.898 ( )-3.002 (C)5.201 (O)-1.797 (. (1. /TT1 12 Tf 1.0999999 0 0 1.0999999 -5.0332519 -39.599996 cm /Pages 8 0 R Plaintiff objects to Definition No. )]TJ << /Length 5 0 R /Filter /FlateDecode >> Therefore, there are no "third part[ies]" as that term is defined. endstream 7. 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 81.995 679.0819 Tm /Fm0 Do /TT1 12 Tf 47 0 obj 104.03 792 0.83 -792 re 0 -446.832 l /TT0 12 Tf Recently I sawthe following document response and without even looking at the document request I knew that the response was bad and a motion to compel further responses was going to need to be filed: Objection, as some or all of these documents are equally or more available to Plaintiffs. << [(S)-3.1 (E)-3.9 (T)-3 ( N)1.9 (O)-1.9 (. endobj T* /TT1 12 Tf Plaintiff objects to this document request as overbroad, burdensome, vague, and ambiguous to the extent that it relies on the term "reflecting," which is not defined in Dentsply's Second Request for Documents and First Set of Interrogatories. PROPOUNDING PARTY: PAUL SAMPLE . T* (11)Tj %PDF-1.3 /dotlessi /lslash /oe /scaron /zcaron 160 /Euro 164 /currency 166 A Request for Production (also known as a Demand for Inspection) asks the other side to produce and allow copying or inspection and measuring of a document or thing. T* f Plaintiff objects to this request as vague and ambiguous because it relies on the undefined term "CID investigation." Document Type: Full - Miscellaneous. [( t)-2 (ha)3.9 (t)-1.9 ( t)-2 (he)3.9 ( c)4.9 (i)-1.9 (t)-2.9 (e)4.8 (d m)-1.9 (e)3.9 (m)-1.9 (or)2.9 (a)3.1 (ndum)-1.8 ( )]TJ x%0>7P{Reu1D endobj Plaintiff objects to Definition No. >> T* Plaintiff further objects to this interrogatory as overbroad and unduly burdensome to the extent it seeks information that is readily or more accessible to Defendant from Defendant's own files, including, but not limited to, interrogatory answers that Defendant produced to Plaintiff, transcripts of depositions of current or former directors, officers, and employees of Defendant, documents that Defendant produced to Plaintiff, and correspondence and other communications from Defendant to Plaintiff. q [(A)2 (dm)-2 (i)-1.1 (t)-2 ( t)-2 (ha)3.9 (t)-1.9 ( a)3.1 (f)2.9 (t)-1.9 (e)3.9 (r)3.9 ( r)13 (e)4 (c)3.2 (e)4.8 (i)7.1 (pt )-2 (o)8.9 (f)3 ( EP)-2.7 (A)1.9 (\222)2.2 (s )8.8 (J)-10.9 (ul)-12.8 (y)19.8 ( )30.9 (29, 1985 l)-2.8 (e)4.8 (t)-11.9 (t)-2 (e)3 (r)3 (, Mo)-1.8 (ns)-2.8 (a)4 (nt)-2 (o st)-4 (a)4 (t)-2 (e)14 (d t)8.8 (ha)3.1 (t)8.9 ( EP)-2.7 (A)2.7 (\222)13 (s )]TJ /Annots [] _yD{GT&b. (M)Tj /Filter /FlateDecode f T* Continue Reading WHY THESE OBJECTIONS ARE GARBAGE. This is a general first set request for admissions that is narrowly tailored to the specific facts of the case. The interviews were memorialized by notes and/or memoranda written by Antitrust Division attorneys and staff. /Type /Page The interviews were memorialized by notes and/or memoranda written by Antitrust Division attorneys and staff. << /Annots [] 574.8 791.16 0.71 -791.16 re << << 7. T* 0 -671.089 l >> 0.428 -431.088 l [(3)6.8 (4)6.8 (8)21.806 (1)8.095 (2)6.899 (\\)23.898 (6)21.806 (2)6.899 (6)21.793 (1)5.604 (3)21.806 (8)6.8 (3)8.095 (. /quotesingle 96 /grave 128 /bullet /dagger /daggerdbl /ellipsis /emdash /endash In addition, such materials often summarize the reasons the Division conducted the interview, characterize the importance of the information learned in the interview, draw inferences based on that information, describe the author's impressions concerning the cooperativeness, credibility, or knowledge of the interviewee, and/or identify potential areas of further inquiry. (17)Tj >> )Tj Plaintiff will construe "during" to mean "in the course of.". 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 4.575684 36 cm 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 6.11554 36 cm -46.494 -24 Td )]TJ (2. [(r)3 (e)4.8 (s)-1.7 (t)-2 (a)4.7 (t)-2.7 (e)4.7 (d i)-1.9 (n f)2.9 (ul)-1.9 (l)-2 (. [( t)-1.9 (ha)3 (t,)-2 ( af)4 (t)-1.9 (e)4.8 (r)3 ( r)-7.8 (e)4.8 (a)3.1 (son)-11.1 (a)4.8 (bl)-2.8 (e)4.8 ( )]TJ C)-3 (ode)4 ( \247 )]TJ 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 5.085876 36 cm For example, if a company has very few employees and searching for requested documents would cause a defined detriment to the business, responding counsel should include that information in the party's objections. T* /Resources 99 0 R /Type /Page Here is the first one. /Fm1 Do uuid:6655538f-926d-4155-9895-cad3e0717c55 32 0 obj 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 139.595 75.2636 Tm 47.77 0 Td (21)Tj T* /TT0 12 Tf Plaintiff's Reply Also Objections To Defendant's Second Requirement ForDocuments And First Set The Interrogatories . /TT0 12 Tf 100.44 792 0.83 -792 re 2030.070 and C.C.P. T* !`xw:*5h [(2016.050 \()2.9 (\223)4.9 ([)-7.8 (s])-8.1 (e)3.9 (c)3.2 (t)-2 (i)-1.1 (on 1013 a)3 (ppl)-1.9 (i)-1.1 (e)3 (s )-1.8 (t)-2 (o a)3.1 (n)-9.1 (y)19.9 ( m)-12.8 (e)4 (t)-1.9 (hod of)2.8 ( di)-1.9 (sc)2.8 (ove)4 (r)-16.9 (y)19 ( or)3 ( s)-10 (e)3.9 (r)2.1 (vic)-8 (e)3.9 ( of)-7.8 ( a)4.8 ( m)-1.9 (ot)-2.9 (i)-2 (on pr)3 (ovi)-2 (de)4.8 (d )]TJ -72 -24 Td 1 0 0 1 152.3695068 766 cm /TT0 12 Tf Plaintiff, by and driven its attorneys, and pursuant to Guidelines 33 and 34 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of this Law, responds and objects to Prisoner Dentsply Multinational, Inc.'s ("Dentsply") Second Request in Documents both First Set the . /CropBox [0 0 612 792] Such notes and/or memoranda of interviews have not been reviewed by or considered by the potential testifying expert economist. /Type /Metadata ET q 36 -24 Td Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. Similarly, the subpoena recipient may file a motion to quash or modify the subpoena in the court where compliance is required. T* /Encoding 17 0 R 37.07 0 Td /TT0 12 Tf /Usage 16 0 R and to its attorney of record: The Southern District of New York again illustrates the point. I have received many requests over the years and the next couple of blogs will be responding to some of these requests. [(A)-7.1 (D)1.9 (M)3.1 (IT)-3.9 (S)]TJ /Creator (Aspose Ltd.) /CropBox [0 0 612 792] ( )Tj At the March 8, 1999 conference with the Court, Defendant's counsel suggested that interview memoranda were discoverable. (18)Tj 0 -791.16 l 2. Furthermore, Civil Investigative Demand 13009 was issued to Dentsply, not to third parties. Plaintiff will produce responsive, non-privileged documents in the order or arrangement in which they are maintained within the principal investigatory and case files. << )Tj Secure .gov websites use HTTPS >> 3. )9 ( )-989.9 ([)-6.1 (Th)1.8 (i)-1.9 (s )-182 (R)-3 (e)3.9 (q)10 (ue)4.9 (s)8.1 (t)-1.9 ( )-199.1 (i)-2.9 (s )-191.1 (l)-2 (i)-2.9 (st)-4 (e)4 (d )-189.1 (a)3 (s )-200.9 (N)1.9 (o. [(i)-1.1 (nqui)-2 (r)-7.9 (y)20.8 ( i)-2.8 (nt)-2 (o t)-2 (he)4 ( i)-2 (nf)3.8 (or)3 (m)-1.9 (a)3.9 (t)-1.9 (i)-12 (on t)-2 (ha)3.1 (t)-1.1 ( i)-2 (s )-2 (kn)-2 (own )1.7 (or)4 ( r)3 (e)4.8 (a)4 (di)-12.7 (l)-12 (y)20.7 ( obt)-2.7 (a)4.7 (i)-1.9 (na)3.9 (bl)-1.9 (e)3.1 (, i)-1.1 (t)-2 ( ha)3.1 (s )-1.8 (no)-1.8 (t)-2.1 ( i)-12.8 (de)3.9 (nt)-1.9 (i)-2 (f)2.9 (i)-1.9 (e)3.9 (d a)4.8 (n)-20.7 (y)20.7 ( 12 )]TJ (6)Tj Unlike Federal Rule Civil Procedure 26(e)(1) (2), California law does not impose a continuing duty on a party to supplement their interrogatory or document responses. Responding party objects to this request to the extent it seeks information protected from disclosure by the attorney-client privilege and/or work product doctrine, or any other applicable privilege. >> Documents already produced will not be produced again. /TT0 8.03 Tf Plaintiff objects to Instruction No. 52 0 obj (16)Tj 51.12 0 Td endstream q /Type /Page Such notes and/or memoranda of interviews have not been reviewed by or considered by the potential testifying expert economist. +(91)-9821210096 | how to say nevermind professionally in an email. f << /Length 130 0 R /TT0 11.03 Tf (25)Tj f T* /Rotate 0 [( Mo)-1.8 (ns)-2 (a)3.1 (nt)-2 (o i)-1.1 (nc)3.1 (or)2.9 (por)3.9 (a)3.2 (t)-1.1 (e)3.1 (s )-2 (b)-20.1 (y)19 ( )-9.9 (r)3.8 (e)4 (f)-7.7 (e)4.7 (r)2.2 (e)4 (n)-9.1 (c)3.9 (e)-5.9 ( G)1.9 (e)3.1 (ne)4 (r)-6 (a)3.1 (l)-2 ( O)2 (bj)-2 (e)4 (c)4.8 (t)-1.9 (i)-2.9 (ons )-2 (1-)1.8 (6 )-9.9 (he)3.1 (r)3 (e)4.8 ( a)3.1 (s )]TJ /Artifact <>BDC /Parent 15 0 R 44 0 obj (10)Tj >> (5)Tj T* /Rotate 0 (21)Tj In fact, boilerplate general objections are sanctionable in California per Korea Data Systems Co. Ltd. v. Superior Court (1997) 51 Cal.App.4th 1513 and may result in waivers of privilege per Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Ry Co. v. U.S. Dist. /Fields [] -103.32 -24 Td Quality objectives. Subject to and notwithstanding this objection, Plaintiff will use the more expansive definition of "third party" that it has provided in above Objection 3, and it will treat "statements" as covering those made by the individuals and entities listed in Plaintiff's Rule 26(a)(1) Initial Disclosures during Plaintiff's civil investigation of Dentsply's distribution and marketing of artificial teeth. )-200.8 (27 )-199.1 (i)-2 (n )-190.8 (P)-3.2 (l)-2 (a)13.9 (i)-1.9 (n)9 (t)8.9 (i)-1.9 (f)2.9 (f)2.2 (s)9.8 (\222)13 ( )]TJ (4)Tj OBJECTIONS: Relevance. Monsanto's responses and objections to plaintiff's Requests are made solely for the purposes of discovery in this action. General Objections The Department objects to each Interrogatory and Request insofar as it seeks production or disclosure of documents that require PWD or Raftelis Financial Consultants ("RFC") to undertake an extensive search for information not within its control or custody. fatal motorcycle accident in orlando florida yesterday; mutual of omaha dental provider portal; Accounting. 1 g 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 140.6246 75.2636 Tm (2)Tj Aspose Ltd. [(D)2 (E)-13 (N)1.1 (IE)-3.1 (S)]TJ (19)Tj T* C)-3 (i)-2.8 (v. P)-4 (r)2.9 (oc)4.8 (. T* f 343.8 0 Td /TT0 12 Tf 3, Plaintiff requested that Defendant: "Identify and produce a complete copy of any and all written or official certification of Defendant Lugo receiving or being issue training and/or supervision regarding (CSP-LAC) written policy and procedure issuing out loss of privilege from January 16, 2014 to December 31, 2019." ( )Tj /TT1 12 Tf >> 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 136.9293 505.091 Tm 41 0 obj Such documents include notes of Plaintiff's attorneys and staff and draft and final internal memoranda of Plaintiff, including, but not limited to, interview memoranda, status memoranda, and recommendation memoranda. >> [(w)2 (hi)-2 (c)4 (h w)2 (e)4.8 (r)-7.8 (e)4.8 ( su)-1.8 (bm)-4.7 (i)-2 (t)-2 (t)-1.1 (e)3 (d t)-1.9 (o r)3 (e)-5.1 (g)9.9 (ul)-2.8 (a)4.8 (t)-1.9 (or)-17.9 (y)20.8 ( a)-6.8 (ge)4.8 (nc)3.1 (ies i)-3.5 (n t)-1.1 (h)-10.9 (e)3.9 ( U)2.9 (ni)-2.8 (t)-2 (e)4.8 (d S)-4.8 (t)-2 (a)4 (t)-2 (e)4.8 (s )-1.8 (a)3 (nd ot)-1.9 (he)3 (r)-6 ( c)3.9 (ount)-1.9 (r)2.9 (i)-1.9 (e)3.1 (s.)-1.8 ( )-1.8 (M)-1.1 (onsa)1.1 (nt)-1.9 (o )]TJ [(i)-1.1 (nqui)-2 (r)-7.9 (y)20.8 ( i)-2.8 (nt)-2 (o t)-2 (he)4 ( i)-2 (nf)3.8 (or)3 (m)-1.9 (a)3.9 (t)-1.9 (i)-12 (on t)-2 (ha)3.1 (t)-1.1 ( i)-2 (s )-2 (kn)-2 (own )1.7 (or)4 ( r)3 (e)4.8 (a)4 (di)-12.7 (l)-12 (y)20.7 ( obt)-2.7 (a)4.7 (i)-1.9 (na)3.9 (bl)-1.9 (e)3.1 (, i)-1.1 (t)-2 ( ha)3.1 (s )-1.8 (no)-1.8 (t)-2.1 ( i)-12.8 (de)3.9 (nt)-1.9 (i)-2 (f)2.9 (i)-1.9 (e)3.9 (d a)4.8 (n)-20.7 (y)20.7 ( 12 )]TJ Plaintiff further objects to this instruction as overbroad and unduly burdensome to the extent it seeks (a) documents in the possession, custody, or control of individuals, agencies, or entities other than the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice and its present employees, principals, officials, agents, attorneys, economists, and consultants either assigned to or reviewing this case, (b) documents and answers to interrogatories previously produced by Defendant to Plaintiff in the course of Plaintiff's civil investigation of Dentsply's distribution and marketing of artificial teeth, all transcripts of depositions of employees and former employees of Defendant, all correspondence between the Plaintiff and Defendant, all other information provided by Defendant to Plaintiff, and all information produced by Plaintiff to Defendant in response to discovery requests of Defendant, and (c) documents in possession, custody, or control of the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice and its present officers, employees, principals, officials, agents, attorneys, and consultants to which the attorney work product doctrine, governmental deliberative process privilege, attorney-client privilege, or any other lawful privilege is applicable. Responding party objects to this request as it does not seek relevant documents or documents reasonably calculated to the discovery of admissible evidence. 5 0 obj 13009 issued to Dentsply by the DOJ in connection with its antitrust investigation of Dentsply prior to the filing of its complaint on January 5, 1999," that definition gives no greater meaning to the phrase "CID investigation," unless it is intended to limit the definition of "statement" to any comment, observation, remark, observation, or affirmation, whether in written or oral form, made by a third party to Plaintiff during the Civil Investigative Demand Number 13009 investigation. /ProcSet [/PDF /Text /ImageB /ImageC /ImageI] Such a reading here demonstrates the problems with the use of this undefined term. >> -61.32 -48 Td /odieresis /divide /oslash /ugrave /uacute /ucircumflex /udieresis /yacute /thorn /ydieresis] ( )Tj Among other things, the defendant objected "to the extent that [the request] is overly broad and unduly burdensome." GENERAL OBJECTIONS 1. [(obj)-1.1 (e)3 (c)4.1 (t)-1.9 (i)-2.1 (ons )-2 (a)2.9 (nd gr)3.9 (ounds )-1.8 (t)-3.8 (ha)4.8 (t)-1.9 ( w)1.9 (oul)-1.9 (d r)2.9 (e)3.1 (quire)4.9 ( t)-2.7 (h)-9.2 (e)3.9 ( e)3.1 (x)-9 (c)3.9 (l)-1.9 (usi)-4.9 (on f)3.8 (r)3 (om)-1.9 ( e)3 (vid)-2 (e)2 (nc)4.9 (e)4 ( o)-10.8 (f)3 ( a)-6 (n)-10 (y)20.8 ( st)-3.8 (a)3.9 (t)-1.9 (e)3 (ment o)-10.9 (r)3.8 ( ot)-2.8 (he)4.8 (r)3 ( )]TJ
What Is House Hippo, Self Service Strategy, Shannon Lush Sweat Stains, Evesham Police Officers Names, Articles S